| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
their alignment are correct.
|
|
because of our fiddling with alignment (because doing so is VERY BAD).
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Erik
|
|
__UCLIBC_UCLINUX_BROKEN_MUNMAP__ (which is currently not defined anywhere).
This makes other cases a tiny bit less efficient too.
* Move the malloc lock into the heap structure (locking is still done
at the malloc level though, not by the heap functions).
* Initialize the malloc heap to contain a tiny initial static free-area so
that programs that only do a very little allocation won't ever call mmap.
|
|
|
|
(__heap_free_area_alloc): Use __heap_delete.
(__heap_is_empty): New macro.
|
|
|
|
(HEAP_MIN_FREE_AREA_SIZE): Increase size.
Enable debugging if HEAP_DEBUGGING is defined.
|
|
the malloc/free level, not within the heap abstraction, and there's a
separate lock to control sbrk access.
Also, get rid of the separate `unmap_free_area' function in free.c, and
just put the code in the `free' function directly, which saves a bunch
of space (even compared to using an inline function) for some reason.
|
|
|
|
* Instead of using mmap/munmap directly for large allocations, just use
the heap for everything (this is reasonable now that heap memory can
be unmapped).
* Use sbrk instead of mmap/munmap on systems with an MMU.
|
|
Doc fix.
|
|
smarter than the old "malloc-simple", and actually works, unlike
the old "malloc". So kill the old "malloc-simple" and the old
"malloc" and replace them with Miles' new malloc implementation.
Update Config files to match. Thanks Miles!
|
