| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
dl-cache.h and make use of it. Also disables the lib-path-redundancy check
for the case the cache is not used. Makes use of _PRELOAD_FILE_SUPPORT.
From Peter Mazinger.
|
|
Mazinger implements the changes suggested by me on the uclibc list.
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 02:24 pm, Erik Andersen wrote:
> What I think should be done is
>
> *) Someone that cares about USE_CACHE should fix that option
> up to be sure it works, and give it a proper config entry
> in extra/Configs/Config.in, and rename it to something
> more appropriate such as LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT.
>
> *) When LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT=n, UCLIBC_RUNTIME_PREFIX /usr/X11R6/lib
> should be included in the default library search path in
> dl-elf.c, ldd, and ldconfig.
>
> *) When LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT=y, UCLIBC_RUNTIME_PREFIX /usr/X11R6/lib
> should be excluded from the default library search path in
> dl-elf.c, ldd, and ldconfig, and those wishing to include
> X11 stuff should add that into /etc/ld.so.conf and re-run
> ldconfig.
>
> *) At present, LDSO_CONF and LDSO_CACHE use the same names
> and same structure as glibc. This precludes
> LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT being uses in any sane fashion on a
> dial glibc and uClibc system. Just as it was necessary
> for use to use a different name for 'libuClibc' rather
> than 'libc', and 'ld-uClibc.so.0' rather than
> 'ld-linux.so.2' it seems that these configuration files
> really ought to be given different names.
>
|
|
Remove unused function parameter in ldso.
Remove echo option '-e' since it is not supported on Solaris.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi it is me again.
This is the latest ldso patch. the NEW weak symbol handling works now
with a little special handling in _dl_find_hash(). You get to chose
if you want the new or old handling :)
There was 2 missing _dl_check_if_named_library_is_loaded() calls in _dlopen().
I then disabled the _dl_check_if_named_library_is_loaded() in dl-elf.c since
it is rendundant.
Question, why does some _dl_linux_resolver(), like i386, have 2 calls
to _dl_find_hash()? I think that is wrong, isn't it?
I really hope you can check this out soon ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
_dl_parse_lazy_relocation_information() and _dl_parse_copy_information()
so they are all consistant, allowing for future consolidation.
Trim some trailing whitespace as well.
|
|
|
|
do both operations in a single pass.
|
|
which should simplify enabling arbitrary architectures.
-Erik
|
|
|
|
checking for duplicates and returning an alias if an existing lib
is already loaded is still correct for the dlopen case.
|
|
|
