1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/libpthread/nptl/pthread_tryjoin.c b/libpthread/nptl/pthread_tryjoin.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..904cb5280
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libpthread/nptl/pthread_tryjoin.c
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/* Copyright (C) 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   This file is part of the GNU C Library.
+   Contributed by Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, 2002.
+
+   The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
+   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+   The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+   Lesser General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+   License along with the GNU C Library; if not, write to the Free
+   Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
+   02111-1307 USA.  */
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#include "atomic.h"
+#include "pthreadP.h"
+
+
+int
+pthread_tryjoin_np (threadid, thread_return)
+     pthread_t threadid;
+     void **thread_return;
+{
+  struct pthread *self;
+  struct pthread *pd = (struct pthread *) threadid;
+
+  /* Make sure the descriptor is valid.  */
+  if (DEBUGGING_P && __find_in_stack_list (pd) == NULL)
+    /* Not a valid thread handle.  */
+    return ESRCH;
+
+  /* Is the thread joinable?.  */
+  if (IS_DETACHED (pd))
+    /* We cannot wait for the thread.  */
+    return EINVAL;
+
+  self = THREAD_SELF;
+  if (pd == self || self->joinid == pd)
+    /* This is a deadlock situation.  The threads are waiting for each
+       other to finish.  Note that this is a "may" error.  To be 100%
+       sure we catch this error we would have to lock the data
+       structures but it is not necessary.  In the unlikely case that
+       two threads are really caught in this situation they will
+       deadlock.  It is the programmer's problem to figure this
+       out.  */
+    return EDEADLK;
+
+  /* Return right away if the thread hasn't terminated yet.  */
+  if (pd->tid != 0)
+    return EBUSY;
+
+  /* Wait for the thread to finish.  If it is already locked something
+     is wrong.  There can only be one waiter.  */
+  if (atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (&pd->joinid, self, NULL))
+    /* There is already somebody waiting for the thread.  */
+    return EINVAL;
+
+  /* Store the return value if the caller is interested.  */
+  if (thread_return != NULL)
+    *thread_return = pd->result;
+
+
+  /* Free the TCB.  */
+  __free_tcb (pd);
+
+  return 0;
+}