From 3d909b2123af44ad8cc7ae02c099f8a25d00261b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:44:09 +0000
Subject: In the allocate-and-copy case, don't include the malloc header in our
size calculations.
---
libc/stdlib/malloc/realloc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(limited to 'libc')
diff --git a/libc/stdlib/malloc/realloc.c b/libc/stdlib/malloc/realloc.c
index f19df8bde..f1b78fcbc 100644
--- a/libc/stdlib/malloc/realloc.c
+++ b/libc/stdlib/malloc/realloc.c
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ realloc (void *mem, size_t new_size)
/* Our attempts to extend MEM in place failed, just
allocate-and-copy. */
{
- void *new_mem = malloc (new_size);
+ void *new_mem = malloc (new_size - MALLOC_HEADER_SIZE);
if (new_mem)
{
- memcpy (new_mem, mem, size);
+ memcpy (new_mem, mem, size - MALLOC_HEADER_SIZE);
free (mem);
}
mem = new_mem;
--
cgit v1.2.3