From 05d909bd4203b0df7659709e4c515c6860de43e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "\"Steven J. Hill\"" Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 04:11:20 +0000 Subject: No, '__mempcpy' is used by user-space applications, like coreutils for example and glibc still has '__mempcpy' as a global symbol. How about this, do a complete buildroot file system after hacking uClibc to make sure things work? There's a novel idea. --- libc/string/generic/mempcpy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'libc/string') diff --git a/libc/string/generic/mempcpy.c b/libc/string/generic/mempcpy.c index f2c860107..91d30116f 100644 --- a/libc/string/generic/mempcpy.c +++ b/libc/string/generic/mempcpy.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #undef mempcpy -void attribute_hidden *__mempcpy (void *dstpp, const void *srcpp, size_t len) +void *__mempcpy (void *dstpp, const void *srcpp, size_t len) { __memcpy(dstpp, srcpp, len); return (void *)(((char *)dstpp) + len); -- cgit v1.2.3